After getting creeped out by the first paragraph and then adding
A Space Odyssey to my list of movies
to see, I settled down and listened to Nicholas Carr’s argument. From my
interpretation, it’s not so much a question of “Is Google making us stupid” but
“Is Google changing the way we think?” He referenced many studies done to support
his view that continued internet use is rewiring our brains. Reading isn’t an
instinct; it is a learned behavior that can change. I like the quote he referenced:
“We are how we read.” He suggests
that the way we sift and skim over the internet is affecting our ability to
concentrate on long texts. “If we lose those quiet spaces (in our mind) or fill
them up with ‘content’” then we lose the ability to get into a really good page
turner. We WON’T be able to READ BOOKS. Is anyone else scared out of their
mind?
He pins this problem on search
engines. They make it easy to quickly find hundreds of entries on any subject
that can keep a person occupied and not focused for hours. The internet thrives
on how often you click. Carr brought the founders of Google into his argument.
They, Brin and Page, apparently are into artificial intelligence. If Google
could think for itself it could possibly produce the exact results you wanted
when you entered something into the search bar. But really, our intelligence becomes
artificial as we rely on an entire web of information to be available at the
touch of a button.
I find it interesting that Carr
centers his argument on search engines. It’s not as if Google or Bing or Yahoo
actually have any content. But I suppose if it is all about being efficient and
accessible, search engines do provide those one stop link emporiums. Compared
to my classmates’ blogs, however, it doesn’t seem as if we spend much time
using Google, at least to search. More time was spent on Facebook, YouTube, or
websites of personal interest. If he was to answer the question “If Facebook making
use stupid” though, I think he’d answer no. His paper isn’t about wasting time
on the internet, or losing personal connection, but the way we get information
now by reading snippets and summaries.
Can you imagine the internet
without search engines? Really think about it. If you got online and needed to
find something about…say garden gnomes, how would you? You wouldn’t be able to
just type it in and click “go”. You be frozen on your home page! Or at least
limited to the small number of URL’s you knew. Even if libraries that don’t
have card catalogs you are still able to browse the shelves. Where would the
bookshelves for the internet be? One website with an infinite list of
addresses?
I really like how you brought out the fact that he was only referencing search engines in his comment. I think that was a very good point, that Facebook does not apply to his argument. I also agree that without search engines, we'd be unable to get anywhere on the internet.
ReplyDeleteInteresting concept: internet without search engines. It seems like search engines are really what stimulates the internet
ReplyDelete