Saturday, January 14, 2012

Interest, Interest, and Interest


Joseph Harris’s book was not what I was expecting; it was a pleasant surprise. Usually when you get assigned reading from a text on writing it is about the all standard, if I may say boring, stuff that goes along with writing an academic paper. Harris isn’t about that. He puts those things aside and actually talks about practical things; he doesn’t tell you how to do things but what to include in them.
                It is hard to separate Harris’s definitions of reading and writing; probably because he treats them as one and the same. He says as a reader you should strive to understand the text and know what argument it is trying to make. The structure of the text isn’t as important as its function; what is the author getting at? At that point you have become a writer because to understand the text you need to “rewrite” it. You read what the text has to say, interpret it through your own perspective, and then find a way to use it. Harris describes it as a negotiation between reader and writer; a “coming to terms” as the chapter title suggests. The reader, turned writer, must give the original text its due and then use it to further his point. When comment on a text and provide an opinion, it’s also important to explain how you arrived there. From experience, everyone can have a different perspective even when they read the same piece of work, so it is important to know what yours is.
                Harris views writing in much the same way that Andrew Sullivan does.  They both see the purpose of writing as participating in the conversation. Harris sees writing as “a fluid and social activity.” That sounds like a definition of blogging to me! Harris puts more emphasis on what is said, not in what format. He is drawn to writing that “strives to be a part of public life.” He suggests that writing should be shared and “rewritten” many times so it can push ideas to their limits. Sullivan discussed how he likes the intimacy of sharing with his readers and hearing their responses and seeing where the conversation could go.
While Harris’s discussion of reading and writing makes sense to me (especially as his book is geared towards writing), is it possible to JUST be a reader?

Thursday, January 12, 2012

How We Surf

     With a single exception, as I looked over my classmates internet logs one website always popped up, Facebook. Now really, I’m not that concerned about “what this means” for our generation. I’ve found that people tend to talk of their time spent on Facebook as an addiction or a time killer. Many a time have I been sitting with friends doing homework and have asked what someone is working on, only to get a sheepish, guilty look in response. That is usually followed by he or she (I thought that was appropriate) updating the rest of us on the latest Facebook news. I’ve also had a few friends tell me they are going to erase their Facebook or “cut themselves off.” Personally, I don’t see it as that big a deal. Facebook is not evil. It’s useful for keeping groups up to date on meetings or rehearsals, setting up plans with your friends, and keeping in touch with old ones. I wouldn’t have half the photos I have of myself if not for Facebook; I shudder at the thought of having to print off or email a bunch of jpegs as a way to share pictures. Facebook is great; don’t be ashamed to use it.

     Aside from Facebook, I was interested to see that similar to me a lot of my classmates have a pattern to their internet usage. I usually log on, check my email and the weather from my iGoogle home page, check Facebook, look for new posts on dearblankpleaseblank.com, maybe check the Woot Shirt of the day if I haven’t so far and then get on with my other business. I noticed that others had their few favorite websites that they visited periodically as well. One person always checked the weather in the morning, others would check Facebook and then go surf YouTube, and one person cycled through their favorite news outlets. Other than the normal set of sites, people visited relatively few sites otherwise, and those they did seemed to be from a link on one of their favorites. For every person, these websites provide the structure for internet surfing; they are a place to start and come back to.

Monday, January 9, 2012

iLog


Saturday 1/7/12

10:50am               Facebook:          Checked my news feed and messages, continued 
               poke war, glanced at profile.
 10:55                     Gmail:               no new messages
[got offline]
1:29pm                 Googled “speed of sound” for physics lab. (it’s 340.29 m/s btw)
[got offline]
1:47pm                 Blackboard:        checked the University Physics syllabus
[got offline]
1:56pm                 dearblankpleaseblank.com
1:59pm                 iGoogle:              checked my homepage, currently 37 degrees
                                                               in Denver
2:00pm                 Facebook:          just to see if there’s anything new
2:03pm                 Blackboard:        found the physics problem set and downloaded it
2:07pm                 hulu:                    wanted to see if a new Parks and Rec was up.
                                                               (it wasn’t)
[got offline]
3:08pm                 Googled “surface area of a sphere.”
3:20pm                 Facebook:           put up message to sell two Broncos tickets for 
                                                               tomorrows game
3:30pm                 Gmail:                  printed tickets off
3:40pm                 Facebook:           SOLD!!
[got offline]
6:30pm                 crepesncrepes.com:       checked their hours. They have Nutella crepes!
6:37pm                 Facebook:                     chatted with a friend
[got offline]
\\\
Sunday 1/8/12

12:08pm               Gmail:                  no new messages
12:09pm               Facebook:           checked to see if I have rehearsal
12:13pm               dearblankpleaseblank.com
12:15pm               shirt.woot.com:              shirt of the day!
12:18pm               pbs.org:                         looked up the time for the Downton Abbey
                                                                          season 2 premiere
12:20pm               denverbroncos.com:      double checked time of the game
[got offline]
4:33pm                 Facebook:           status update-“TEBOW TIME!” and turns out I 
                                                                do have rehearsal.
4:41pm                 Gmail:                  new message!
[got offline]
8:58pm                 Gmail:                  new message!
9:00pm                 Facebook:           checked in
[got offline]

Friday, January 6, 2012

Why Andrew Blogs


Why does Andrew Sullivan blog? Apparently he is addicted.  To paraphrase, being able to self-publish your words, hassle-free is like a narcotic.
Andrew likes to blog because its allows writers to forgo all the red tape of writing for a publication – the editing, source checking, cutting – and get straight to the readers. This immediacy is attractive. The blogger and the reader can experience things together, in real time. This creates an intimacy and allows the “humanness” of the blogger to come through. If you can comment on something, right as it is happening, there is no way to prevent the emotions you are feeling to seep into the piece.
Andrew likes to blog because it creates a conversation. Because of the necessity to get something out there, blogs are not polished, and this exposes to them to a wide range of critics. As Andrew put it, blogging is more “accident prone,” it is the extreme sport of the athletic world, it’s “writing out loud.” The emails that are sent can include anything – corrections, different arguments, and links to more information – and that is what gets the conversation rolling. The trade-off back and forth between author and reader creates an informed blog. Andrew compared it to a Wikipedia page.
Andrew likes to blog because it actually allows readers to become more informed. On a blog, when a quote is used or a fact cited, the original source can be directly linked to. Bloggers can show their legitimacy while readers get more information over all. No printed publication can do that.
Andrew just likes to blog.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Day One

Making a blog wasn’t that difficult considering I already had a Google account. The hardest part was thinking up a name. Do you put your name in the title? Should you say it’s for a class? So, I ended up with the ever so creative “Rebecca’s Writing Blog.” Creating a Facebook page was definitely more involved. I mean with a Facebook account you have pictures, personal information, and friends to contend with. For this blog there were simply three steps.
Should it be so easy to create a blog though? I don’t know if it is really the best idea to just let anyone post their thoughts in a continuing online journal. Now, I don’t read any blogs (except one by an old English teacher) but I’m guessing some of them are interesting and useful, like the ones for organizations, while others are either hour by hour descriptions of someone’s day or scary, radical rants. The latter don’t seem that blog-worthy to me, though realistically most personal blogs probably don’t get that many readers and only the popular ones would show up on any search engines. There’s an example of how the internet self-regulates.
                A blog shouldn’t be like a private diary, though I hear some people treat them that way. Obviously it isn’t private; it’s on the internet. Blogs should be used for commentary, as a way to interact with the news around you. They should be a place to post reasonably well thought out opinion pieces.
                I’ve never blogged before, and I don’t even have a tumblr or twitter account, so this should be an interesting experience.